Guiding Principle:
A good test item can be answered by a qualified candidate by reading only the context and stem. If more information is needed, the item probably needs revising.
The following guidelines are based on those presented by Rodriguez, M.C. (2016). They have been adapted to apply to DataCamp’s specific use and format of assessment.
Content
Each item should test only one concept as specified by the associated learning objective
Items should not use content from DataCamp course/practice/project materials, new materials should be used to test higher-order thinking
Items should be independent of one another
Items should test important concepts and not overly specific content e.g. the difference between two very similar functions should not be tested
Avoid opinions
Avoid trick items
Style
The following are additions to DataCamp’s style guidelines which should also be followed.
Linguistic complexity should be kept appropriate to the level of the test takers
Minimize the amount of reading in each item, avoid window dressing
Items should be based around a real life-situation to test test higher-order thinking
Writing the stem
State the central idea clearly and concisely in the stem and not in the options
Word the stem positively, avoid negative phrasing
Multiple-Choice Item Guidelines
Use only options that are plausible and discriminating. There should be four options unless there is a strong argument for more or fewer options.
Broadly speaking, a good question can be answered without looking at the options. A question that needs the candidate to read and choose between options is often not tightly enough aligned around a learning objective, and risks testing reading skills rather than subject knowledge.
Ensure that only one of the options is correct
Vary the location of the correct answer
Give options in logical or numerical order
Keep options independent. They should not overlap
Avoid the use of “none-of-the-above”, “all-of-the-above” and “I don’t know”
Word options positively, avoid negative words
Avoid giving clues to the right answer
Keep the length of options roughly equal
Avoid specific determiners (e.g. always, never)
Avoid pairs of triplets of options that clue the test taker to the correct choice
Avoid blatantly absurd or ridiculous options
Keep options homogeneous in content and grammatical structure
Make all distractors plausible. Common mistakes and misconceptions can be used to write good distractors
Avoid the use of humor
Fill-in-the-blank item Guidelines
Use only options that are plausible and discriminating, three options are sufficient, four are preferred
Ensure that only one of the options, or combination of options, is correct
Only leave blanks that test the learning objective.
Typing item Guidelines
Ensure that all possible correct solutions will be accepted as correct, test takers should not be penalized for use of an equally correct answer
The expected output should always be present.
Ensure that no answer, a partial answer, or the wrong answer will always return an incorrect answer
Ensure that the correct answer is not revealed in the output code e.g. a model formula isn’t printed in the output
The expected output should be consistent. Do not include non-deterministic elements that would mean the expected output would vary.
Graphics in items
Avoid reference to specific colors (e.g. “The red line shows the median”)
Reference
Rodriguez, M.C. (2016) ‘Selected-Response Item Development’ in Lane, S (ed), Raymond, M.R. (ed), Haladyna, T.M. (ed) Handbook of Test Development 2nd Edition, Routledge, pp259-273